Subject	Not trying to pick a fight but----->
Posted by	Kyle(Houston) on August 21, 2003 at 5:32 PM
	This message has been viewed 39 times.
In Reply To	700.0ft/lbs torque is even more impressive. (n/m) posted by AshsZ of Z1Motorsports.com on August 21, 2003 at 11:33 AM
Message	The torque is really peaky.....you hit 700 Ft/Lbs at 4500 but it was down to ~525 Ft/Lbs at 6900. Wouldn't a flat torque line be more useable? I am just curious becuase I have always tuned for a flat torque line but it looks like you were after the peak number? Just curious for why you tuned it like that? Kyle "Grumpy Bear" Puckett Sales@sgpracing.com
Follow Ups	744...is today's MAGIC NUMBER!!!! - DutchZX 11:10:22 08/21/03 linky - DutchZX 11:11:48 08/21/03 u should see the chart. with the spray...wow - genic 11:18:11 08/21/03 Where is it? (n/m) - ZHOUND 11:34:37 08/21/03 Wagz needs to turn up the boost next time. :-) - ZHOUND 11:23:01 08/21/03 For Now?:-) You have something in mind? (n/m) - George(boost-solutions.com) 11:41:10 08/21/03 records are always made to be broken.... - takirb 11:57:11 08/21/03 define "stock motor" please. :) (n/m) - LordZ 14:23:22 08/21/03 The pic by itself for the uber lazy... - hoss 11:26:51 08/21/03 yep. awesome work wagz. (n/m) - joel(PA) 11:13:06 08/21/03 Sweetness. - hoss 11:15:35 08/21/03 i havent been able to get on supraforums for about 3 weeks - joel(PA) 11:17:49 08/21/03 Go try it now, came back yesterday or the day b4 (n/m) - ZPilot(Miami) 11:20:15 08/21/03 That was a number that was hard for us to hold back. - John@Z1 11:19:29 08/21/03 I'm getting tired of saying this: NICE!!! :-) (n/m) - Arnel(Z32racing.com) 11:32:18 08/21/03 700.0ft/lbs torque is even more impressive. (n/m) - AshsZ of Z1Motorsports.com 11:33:32 08/21/03 2nd. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 11:46:08 08/21/03 Not trying to pick a fight but-----> - Kyle(Houston) 17:32:41 08/21/03 It was actually more of a 'lets see what she'll do' - AshsZ of Z1Motorsports.com 21:12:34 08/21/03 So why is the torque line so peaky if you weren't shooting-> - Kyle(Houston) 21:35:25 08/21/03 I dont agree that it is peaky. - AshsZ of Z1Motorsports.com 22:47:09 08/21/03 Awesome work, Wagz:-) What is next?:-) (n/m) - George(boost-solutions.com) 11:42:28 08/21/03 24psi w/ 100shot now that we know how well she handled - Wagz 11:51:57 08/21/03 Corrected right? What were the uncorrected numbers? (n/m) - ZHOUND 11:54:12 08/21/03 These a great numbers for 20 psi and 60 shot. Did you freeze - George(boost-solutions.com) 12:01:08 08/21/03 I wonder who wrote that article on it???? I wonder - Milo (San Antonio, TX.) 11:42:44 08/21/03 Seriously... that was the "mild" tune... - Kenny 9 psi 11:43:48 08/21/03 Re: Seriously... that was the "mild" tune... - ZHOUND 11:51:01 08/21/03 Okay... - Kenny 9 psi 11:58:03 08/21/03 Without upping the nitrous. - ZHOUND 12:00:10 08/21/03 Okay - I gotcha. - Kenny 9 psi 12:03:13 08/21/03 On my car, 4psi gave me 65rwhp. - ZHOUND 12:12:33 08/21/03 thats about what i think, pretty sure it would have been - Wagz 12:07:12 08/21/03 Go back and shoot for 800rwhp. - ZHOUND 12:13:39 08/21/03 Take the 16G's and make them 18G's w/100shot and yes. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 12:06:40 08/21/03 Good #'s,hopefully I will see similar results. - sleek 18:08:20 08/21/03 So where is the Dyno chart, or do you have to >>> - TonyD(90Z32TT) 11:53:10 08/21/03 the second one. (n/m) - Kenny 9 psi 11:58:44 08/21/03 Oh wow. Way above my expectations of 600. (n/m) - SooperZ95 12:02:50 08/21/03 Wow! Great jorb Wagz! (n/m) - 1991S13 12:07:40 08/21/03 WTF? Who told you about his jorb? (n/m) - Kenny 9 psi 12:12:42 08/21/03 lol (n/m) - Wagz 12:18:49 08/21/03 ok guys - D-JAY 18:18:58 08/21/03 thanks Dutch....greatly appreciate the kind words! (n/m) - Wagz 12:09:17 08/21/03 simply amazing - TwinTurboPete 12:10:58 08/21/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.